Marlee Matlin Biography for Asl Essay Essays

Marlee Matlin Biography for Asl Essay Essays Marlee Matlin Biography for Asl Essay Paper Marlee Matlin Biography for Asl Essay Paper Marlee Matlin is an Academy Award winning American Actress and writer. She has been deaf since she was 18 months old. she is besides a outstanding member of the Deaf community and supports the usage of mark linguistic communication. closed captioning. and is an active member of the National Association of the Deaf. Marlee Beth Matlin was born on August 24. 1965. in Morton Grove. Illinois. Her female parent. Libby. was a jewellery gross revenues adult female and her male parent. Donald. operated a used auto franchise. Marlee is the youngest of three kids and is the lone member of her household who is Deaf. She is of Russian Jewish decent and was able to hold her Bat Mitzvah by larning Hebrew phonetically. As Matlin recounts in her autobiography. I’ll Scream Later. turning up. her parents expressed a concern that her hearing loss would be an indissoluble barrier in a hearing universe. But alternatively of agonising over this. her parents faced it caput on and embraced it. They sent Matlin to schools where she learned to both speak and mark. and encouraged her to do friends in the vicinity. With strong support from her household. Marlee’s childhood universe was limitless. Matlin made her phase introduction at the age of 7. as Dorothy in the ICODA ( International Center for Deafness and the Humanistic disciplines ) version of The Wizard of Oz. Matlin maintained a passion for moving throughout her childhood and while gaining her grade in Criminal Justice at Harper College. At the age of 20. during a public presentation in the Midwest. Matlin caught the oculus of American histrion. manager. and manufacturer Henry Winkler and was cast for the lead function in Children of a Lesser God ( 1986 ) . This movie brought her a Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in Drama and an Academy Award for Best Actress. doing her both the youngest and the lone deaf actress to win the Academy Award for Best Actress in a Leading Function. She learned of her Oscar nomination while having intervention for a substance maltreatment job while in an opprobrious relationship. Matlin viewed this recognition as an chance to turn her life about and to switch her focal point onto her dr eam of moving. Since her Academy Award. Matlin has played a assortment of obliging functions and has since earned multiple Emmy Award nominations. She has appeared in the independent movie â€Å"What the Bleep Do You Know? † and has happening functions in hit telecasting series The L Word. The West Wing. Dancing with the Stars. and Switched at Birth. On the telecasting set of Reasonable Doubts. Marlee met her hubby. policeman Kevin Grandalski. She and her hubby have 4 kids: Sarah. 15. Brandon. 11. Tyler. 9. and Isabelle. 8. After the birth of her kids. Matlin branched out into a new way. carry throughing a longtime dream of composing a children’s book and stating the universe what it’s like being Deaf. In 2002. she published her immature grownup fresh Deaf Child Crossing. In 2009. she published her autobiography I’ll Scream Later. Marlee is frequently credited for presenting 1000000s of viewing audiences and readers to subscribe linguistic communication and issues affecting the Deaf community. Outside of moving and composing. Matlin is a strong protagonist of the Deaf Community. Matlin is peculiarly influencial because she has worked straight with policymakers. She was instrumental in estabilishing congressional legistlation that all telecasting sets manufactured in the USA be equipped with Closed Caption engineering. She besides serves on the boards of a figure of charitable organisations and is a outstanding member of the National Association of the Deaf. While turn toing favoritism and barriers during an interview with About. Marlee stated: â€Å"I expression at these state of affairss non as challenges. but as chances to demo how proud I am of my rich civilization - deaf civilization. Actually. I like the new manner of looking at Deaf civilization. It’s called Deafhood. It’s the thought that hearing loss has a positive value instead than as something that needs to be cured or is disputing. It’s all about doing noise and standing up for who we are. Being deaf agencies being anything but silent. On the reverse. when one accepts deaf people of all sorts and linguistic communication penchants as their civilization. one realizes that silence is the last thing one will of all time hear from them. † And Marlee Matlin. you are heard.

halie selassie i essays

halie selassie i essays Haile Selassie I was born on July 23,1892. His real name was Ras Tafari Makonnen. He was born into a royal family which he later took over the thrown as king. It has been said that Selassie I was a direct descendant of King Solomon of Israel and the Queen of Sheba. Haile Selassie I was one of greatness and importance. The names that he held and the power he had were uncanny. Selassie was referred to in many ways and had many names. But they were not just any names they were names that were written in the bible. Names such as King of Kings; Lord of Lords; Conquering Tribe of the Lion of Judah. These were very powerful names that Selassie held. Also written in the bible is that Jesus will come back in the flesh and we will be unaware of it. Many believed it was him, especially in Jamaica. His trip to Jamaica was very memorable. What took place when he arrived in Jamaica was phenomenal. Many knew of his coming and in light of that waited in the airport for his arrival. These people waited in the rain. It had been raining for the past couple of days. For hours they waited and come to find out the plane was running late. Then suddenly 7 pure white doves flew out of the stormy clouds and as they did so the rain stopped. Immediately after the rain stopped there was the plane, he finally arrived and the people rejoiced in his presence. Before he left Jamaica a type of religion was started called Rastafarianism. This is a belief in a god called Jah, which they believed to be Selassie I. People who practiced this belief wore their hair in dred lox to give themselves what they call a dred appearance ...

Mergers & Acquisitions (Big focus on AECOM acquisition of URS) Literature review

Mergers & Acquisitions (Big focus on AECOM acquisition of URS) - Literature review Example Due to the wake of economic reforms, entities are viewing it prudent to restructure their operations around their principal business activities strategically through acquisition because of their burgeoning exposure to competition from both domestic and international arena. According to the existing literature, companies engage in mergers and acquisitions for myriad reasons. Some of these motives are view as being good since they are aimed at maximizing the shareholders wealth while others merge or acquire others for questionable reasons (Ferris & Petitt 2013). In essence, companies should pursue mergers and acquisitions only if such actions create value. In other words, companies should merge if they are working as a single unit as opposed to working individually offers a greater value. Ferris and Petitt’s (2013) study established that synergies take three forms namely financial, managerial and operating synergies. Financial synergies arise from lower financing cost because big companies have access to a broader and cheaper pool of funds compared to small companies (Malik et al., 2014, p. 528; Koi-Akrofi, 2014, p. 1812). When companies that carry out unrelated businesses merge, there is the reduction in risk that makes them increase their debt capacity and enable them to lower their before-tax financing cost. In this context, there is also the aspect of improved financing in the sense that companies facing financial problems may be forced to look for others that are financially stable to acquire them instead of going out of busines s or taking bankruptcy. The merger causes the firm to expand which makes it easily get access to debt and equity financing which was initially beyond its reach. According to an analysis done by the New York University Stern School of Business (2015) and Malik et al. (2014, p. 528) mergers

HR Strategy Achieving Quality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

HR Strategy Achieving Quality - Essay Example However, in order to make it more official, they will request the employers to consent to it in case of employee violation, or the labor unions could sue the employer. (Deming, 1986) In the event that the 14 principles are against the requirements of a given union, the unions can instigate the push for legal action in an area that concerns the interested parties. In the case of an employer, the trade union will not support that which is against the rights of the workers. Similarly, union can also hinder the principles if through them the employer will be violating the rights of the employee’s participation in a trade union. (Deming, 1986) To begin with, is if the union supports the principles intended to benefit both parties (employers and employees); second, are the principles opposed by the union positive or negative; third, are unions willing to deliberate on a matter to come to an agreement; fourth, does the union address the needs of the members; finally, does union negatively or positively affect the employers or employees. (Deming,

Novel Frankenstein Essay Example for Free

Novel Frankenstein Essay The Novel Frankenstein is as relevant and terrifying today as it was when it was first published Explain How Mary Shelley makes her narrative effective and why it has fascinated and shocked audiences for nearly 190 years. Frankenstein is one of the most well known gothic horror stories. Frankenstein is set in the seventeen hundreds and was written by Mary Shelley. Mary Shelley wrote the book in 1816 and Frankenstein was first published in 1818. Mary Shelley blends gothic horror and romance which makes this novel world-famous and so successful. The novel has also been so successful because of the effective narrative Mary Shelley uses to shock and fascinate her readers. Such as the use of a lot of very detailed descriptive language and the use of three narrators to get different emotions and feelings to the reader. During the nineteenth century, electricity was a relatively new invention. This meant that many scientists were testing the use of electricity with the body. Scientists thought that Electricity could bring a dead person back to life. Erasmus Darwin suggested that this was possible. Mary Shelley was aware of a process called galvanism and a scientist named Luigi Galvani who had discovered that electricity flowed through nerves meaning that when electricity was placed in certain places on a dead body or animal if would move and look like it was alive. Scientists were learning more and more about the human body and how it worked. The general public were very interested and fascinated by these discoveries. Mary Shelley was from the romantic period. The Romantics believed in the power of the imagination. They looked to nature for and saw awe and wonder in its majesty. They distanced themselves from the evils of capitalism and industrialism. This could have lead here to write this story to show people how messing with science could lead to disaster, as it was messing with nature which was the main inspiration for the romantics. Mary Shelley was from a very radical family with very strong beliefs. Her mother was a campaigner for women to have equal rights and her father was another political free-thinker. He said that as long as people acted sensibly, there would be no need for rules or laws. Her mother died 10 ten days after giving birth to her and Mary Shelley also lost her own daughter within 2 weeks of giving birth. The reader also experiences these feelings when Frankensteins mother dies, just like Mary Shelleys mother. This is a technique to get the reader to feel the same as Shelley did to make the novel seem more real. These could be the reasons why Mary Shelley was so obsessed with bringing the dead back to life and the inspiration behind her novel Frankenstein. Mary Shelley got the inspiration for the novel in the snowy summer of 1816. In 1815 there had been an eruption from Tambora which had set the world into a long volcanic winter meaning that the summer of 1816 was a dark and cold one. Mary Shelley and her husband Percy Shelley had visited Lord Byron at his villa by Lake Geneva in Switzerland. The weather was too cold to go outside and enjoy a normal summer, so Byron challenged Mary Shelley and his personal physician John Polidori to each compose a story of their own, and the winner would be whose story was the most terrifying. Mary Shelley got the idea for her novel when she had a half-waking nightmare, and then she wrote this down giving her the main inspiration for Frankenstein. Frankenstein is about a young student of natural philosophy called Victor Frankenstein. He is determined to find the secret of life, and when he does he creates a living creature. The monster is gentle and kind, but is abounded by Frankenstein because he looks too ugly; this means he has to hide away from society as all who meet him are afraid of him. As the monster is lonely and isolated, that causes him to take revenge on his creator. He does this by not killing him, but all the ones he loves and cares about. Frankenstein, having nothing worth living for, pursues his monster to the Artic in order to destroy him. This leads him to exhaustion and death, the monster then sees he is dead and then kills himself as it is the only place he can seek rest. The novel shows the horrible consequences of playing God and this is what makes the book fascinating, as it questions all the main beliefs of religion and the soul. The book is different as it has three narrators who are Frankenstein, Robert Walton and the monster. They all narrate and give the reader a different insight into the story, which makes the book very unique. This technique is very effective because as it gives a different insight into each character it can make the reader feel different emotions for each character. Such as when it is Victor Frankenstein telling us his own story, it makes the reader feel more sympathetic towards him because the reader experiences the tragedies and upsets that Frankenstein feels.

Essay --

I. GREEN FLOAT PROJECT The world’s first floating nation is set to be located in the islands of Kirabati. The islands are quickly sinking due to rising sea levels. Currently they are located only six feet above the sea level. Actions are being taken to save the islands by literally placing the current islands onto reconstructed man-made islands and building a city in the sky on top. Anote Tong, president of Kiribati, knows that this plan is drastic but he feels it is necessary to save the islands. Kiribati has invested in many other initiatives to stop the impending fate of the nation, though due to lack of funding he has not been able to implement them. He believes a project like this will attract international funding because it is a sustainable solution that will work not only for Kiribati but for other similarly situated areas. A cutting edge Japanese company called Shimuzu Corp. came up with this ambitious plan to prevent the impending loss of Kiribati. The project is being called the city in the sky as well as the green float project. The costs are estimated to be upwards of three hundred and seventeen billion dollars. Future units are going to become cheaper overtime. Each tower unit will be built to house thirty thousand people, and will also provide space for commercial activities. The units are going to be able to be connected to accommodate a combined one hundred thousand people. The base of the islands will be constructed with impenetrable materials that need little maintenance but are extremely costly. These man-made islands are referred to as lily pads. They will be three thousand meters wide and one thousand meters tall. The bases of the islands will be completely secured; they are set ... ...lar to receiving a reward for contributing green energy into the grid, the May initiative gives rewards for people who in their private property develop facilities and other means to accommodate excess water. Similar in certain respects to the LiFe project, this initiative is different in that property owners do it completely individually. The government would reward or compensate people for their capacity to control water on their property. Some examples of initiatives that will be rewarded will be homeowners with large areas of permeable land, reservoirs, and many more. This initiative will not only help with flood relief but also will result in education about climate change. It will give people a reason to become responsible for their actions and become conscious of their actions climatically. Monetary rewards will bring interest into joining the initiative.

Porter

Michael five forces model Rivalry among competing Firms: this is usually the most powerful of the five competitive forces. The strategies pursued by one firm can be successful only to the extent that they provide competitive advantage over the strategies of other firms (Grobler 2009) ? Due to China’s incredibly high FDI rate, more and more companies are investing into Chinese businesses and strengthening them in both their domestic markets and also on the global front. With the ever increasing growth of their domestic markets it will only be a short while before they become the dominant market leader, if in this span of 30 years they could rise from nothing to 4th largest in the world then it shows what impact they really had and still have on the global economy. Potential entry of new competitors: whenever new firms can easily enter a particular industry, the intensity of competitiveness among firm’s increases. ?When new firms become strengthened through investments, they become direct competitors of the leaders in that industry. . g. A new Chinese innovation in the television industry grows rapidly, they will be direct competitors against any television firms based in China, for example LG and Sony Bargaining power of consumers: when consumers are concentrated, large or buy in volume their bargaining power represents a major force affecting intensity of competition in an industry (Grobler 2009) ? This goes for actual customers(public) and b2b businesses, because those that buy the larger quantities would get the cheaper rates no doubt, however in China how will that be decided? Will it be their size, market share, sales or Return on capital employed. Potential development of substitute products: in many industries firms are in close competition with producers of substitute products in other industries. ?As mentioned throughout this article, the Chinese have the ability to imitate anything, this factor will never disappear especially if Chinese firms enter European or American markets, how those manufacturers would react to the Chinese developments are unimaginable. Bargaining power of suppliers: the bargaining power of suppliers affects the intensity of completion in an industry, especially when there are large number of suppliers, when there are only a few good substitutes’ raw materials or when cost of switching materials is especially costly (Grobler 2009) Porter’s five forces will only be effective if it is done in a stable environment, it is done to see how attractive the industry is and if it is worth starting a new venture in that environment. Porter’s generic strategies †¢Cost leadership †¢Differentiation †¢Focus Cost leadership: Cost leadership means having the lowest per-unit (i. . , average) cost in the industry that is, lowest cost relative to your rivals. This could mean having the lowest per unit cost among rivals in highly competitive industries, in which case returns or profits will be low but however higher than competitors Or, this could mean having lowest cost among a few rivals where each firm enjoys pricing power and high profits Notice that cost leadership is defined independently of market structure. Differentiation: Differentiating the product offering of a firm means creating something that is perceived industry wide as being unique. It is a means of creating your own market to some extent. There are several approaches to differentiation: †¢Different design †¢Brand image †¢Number of features †¢New technology A differentiation strategy may mean differentiating along 2 or more of these dimensions. Focus: Here we focus on a particular buyer group, product segment, or geographical market. while low cost and differentiation are aimed at achieving their objectives industry wide, the focus or niche strategy is built on serving a particular target (customer, product, or location) very well. Note, however, hat a focus strategy means achieving either a low cost advantage or differentiation in a narrow part of the market. For reasons discussed above, this creates a defendable position within that part of the market. Risks of doing generic strategies Cost leadership †¢Requires continual capital investment because newer innovations cause older creations to become obsolete. †¢When focusing solely on making affordable low cost products, it can cause firms to be blinded to product changes that are needed. Ie. Quantity over quality †¢When costs do begin to increase it narrows the differences between competitors and advantage is ultimately lost For China, the main risk that would affect them the most is when focusing solely on quantity, especially because of their expertise in manufacturing they could lose sight of changes that need to be done to better sales. However, China does have the leading number of R&D departments, even though they might not be as innovative as the Japanese or South Koreans, they have the ability to imitate anything they produce which is why they play a major role in globalization, they can imitate anything except fresh air as they say. Differentiation Customer loyalty becomes too large to hold because of the cost differentiation between low cost firms and differentiating firms. †¢The consumer or buyer’s need to differentiate falls away because of price increases. †¢Imitation decreases perceived differentiation This area is where China are dominant, because they have the influence of causing differentiation to fail, because if the product looks the same, and does the same thing, the n why would they ever go for the more expensive, and thus Chinese markets prosper because economies of scale have brought their price down dramatically. This is also when manufacturers have to start looking for alternative suppliers because they now have to compete with China which is not an easy task, and in doing so, it almost definitely forces them to go global. Focus †¢When companies market to niches only they already take the risk of not completely satisfying a demographic segment and with other companies finding alternatives ways to better their market share eg. FDI or R&D labs, they face the risk of dissolving. On its own focus strategy’s should not be attempted by almost any kind of company, its main purpose is to satisfy a small group of consumers at a time, and if this is not the aim of the business then they are going to fall extremely short on their company vision. Books Grobler, W. (2009) Business strategy, CTI Education Group, Johannesburg. Johnson, G. scholes, K. Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring corporate strategy, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Economics Paper Essay

1: Define the term ‘equilibrium price’: The price at which quantity demanded by consumers and the quantity of goods and services supplied by firms is the same. 3: With the help of an appropriate diagram and the information in extract B, explain why the world price of sugar changed in 2009: The price of sugar rose to $0.40 per kilo in 2009 – this is shown in the extract as it states that in 2009 prices in New York and London rose by 52% to its highest in almost three years. The diagram below shows how the inward shift of supply caused by poor crop harvests and India’s %40 fall in output of sugar affected the price of sugar due to its scarcity, leading to the %52 rise in price of sugar. Another factor that could have had an effect on the price of sugar would have been in 2008 there were poor crop harvests that year – this led to a low level of supply in 2008 which raised the price of sugar due to its scarcity. This poor harvest would have had something to do with the land quality –this may have affected the harvest in 2009. Supply constraints also had an effect, as due heavy rainfall the Columbian crop was damaged – the rain also washed away some of the roads used to transport the products from the field to the market. So whatever crop the farmers managed to save from the rain was then prevented from reaching market, this would have contributed to the price rise in a way similar to the diagram above. India is a main producer of sugar, so much so that its sugar output is a critical factor in determining the world price of sugar. India’s output was forecast to fall by %40 so only 15million tonnes of sugar would have been produced in the growing season – this is well below India’s sugar consumption of 23million tonnes a year. This would mean that India wouldn’t be inclined to export much of its sugar as there’s already a deficit of supply in its own country. Although, with this large fall in supply there’ll most likely be a rise in sugar price in India – the people may not be willing or able to pay the new price so whatever amount of sugar is leftover could be exported, at a price which would lead to the %52 rise in London and New York sugar prices.

buy custom Internal and External Stakeholders essay

buy custom Internal and External Stakeholders essay Stakeholders are individuals interested in the outcome of policies and the success of an organization. This drives them to influence the outcome of such results and accomplishment of financial obligations. In normal cases, there exist two groups of stakeholders: internal and external stakeholders, who exist within the organizations setting and those outside the organization respectively. For example, a stakeholder can be the owner of the business, employee, manager, customer, partner or even a supplier among others; and contributes to the business of an organization either directly or indirectly (Bernstein Bonafede, 2011). Additionally, either stakeholders, internal or external may involve themselves with the outcome of a project or activity other than business, but they often stand to lose or gain depending on the decisions made or policies implemented in the organization. This paper aims to analyze the influence that the internal and external stakeholders have on the homeland secu rity issues such as lack of communication and organization. In reference to the organization structure of the Homeland organization, jurisdiction and organization correlated and directly faced impact from the actions of both the internal stakeholders like the CIA and DOD and the external stakeholders (partners who have an interest in ensuring that homeland achieves the best in maintaining security in the United States). For instance, the internal stakeholders have considerable access to the administration and the structure of the Homeland organization, hence any decision that the organization makes they also have to go through first before implementation. This positively influences the decisions on the organizational structure in that they unbiasedly settle on the best model structure to implement in management and operations of homeland security. As a result, this has led to the advanced restructured arrangements of the departments in homeland security leading to easy communication, transparency and efficiency in homeland operations (Bernste in Bonafede, 2011). On the other hand, any changes in the jurisdiction of the homeland security organization, directly affects their respective stakeholders who in return have to source out alternative lines of access to the organizations successful operations. Hence, they end up persuading new partners into networking with the homeland security organization, which consequently changes the organization's structure entirely. Stakeholders especially, internal stakeholders normally prefer to have all the programs constituted under one cluster for easy management on the full range, therefore, this consolidation of programs sees that an organization consolidates its structure into one compact model for easy management. Evidently, the internal stakeholders have influenced the same on homeland security organization, hence the existence of the cabinet-level departments at the organization that promote specialization in dealing with security issues. This consolidation of programs has also positively impacted on the security issue on lack of communication; in that the organization now has advanced into a close need structure of communication that updates them with highly crucial details about security anytime, anywhere. On the contrary, the scatter of programs among the different partnering agencies (external stakeholders) has also negatively affected the communication channels that relay immediate feedback to the homeland security base in the United States. The scattered nature of the external stakeholders also negatively affected the communication of the homeland security; in that, the organization lacked proper consolidation of ideas and strategies to plan for any cases of terrorist attacks. Hence, t his subsequently led to their fragmentation following the terrorist attack in November 2001 (Sauter Carafano, 2005). Furthermore, the shared responsibility by the external stakeholders has seen the homeland security organization restructure its department to cover all sectors in ensuring a balance in the food, industry and agriculture security, which emerges as on the stakeholders leading positive effects. The external stakeholders such as the federal agencies involved in communication issues that deal with security, negatively affect the homeland organizations communication network due to their resistance in accepting the link between the local, federal and state partners in sharing critical information regarding matters of state in national security. Additionally, the lack of clarified roles and identification of external stakeholders has negatively influenced the effort of the Homeland security organization in implementing advanced model structures of the organization's management in order to increase their operations effectiveness. Nevertheless, other external partners or stakeholders of the homeland security organization such as FDA, DHS and USDA have facilitated better communication (Sauter Carafano, 2005). They did so through networking in an effort to obtain security clearances for some state personnel during critical, emergency operations in communication and sharing of sensitive security information. Since the rapidness in communication and notification systems used during incident reporting requires the careful merge of both the external and the internal stakeholders in decision-making, this has positively influenced the communication channels opening the organization to the world for easy communication and feedback on security related issues. This collaboration has also led to the strengthened ties between the organization and other scattered external stakeholders improving its operations and in return synchronizing its organizational structure for better management. Considering stakeholders in solving the problem linked to lack of communication and organization will come in handy because an organization without partners may likely fail or perform poorly, and since evidence exists that supports the positive benefits of the stakeholders contributions to the homeland security organization outweighing the negative, they hold an extremely vital position in the solution. The homeland security organization needs to increase and expand its link to external stakeholders because matters of state security need more networking from outside partners rather than the internal stakeholders. Conclusion In conclusion, individuals need to understand that, for effective performance and success in the functions of an organization, support from other extended and interested parties, like stakeholders emerges is extremely crucial and almost inevitable (Sauter Carafano, 2005). Evidence lies in the success of the homeland security through the strength and support of its stakeholder, who managed to ensure United States security by capturing Osama Bin Laden. It is essential to avoid bureaucracy in an organization. The stakeholders should be given an opportunity to take part in the decision making process of an organization. Stakeholders should get a chance to celebrate the victory of the organization as they played a role in meeting the objective. The stakeholders should also play a role in the growth of their positions in the organization. It is crucial to engage in one on one coaching of the stakeholders so as to inform them about the details of your solution and the reason why you chose it. When the stakeholders give their views, it is necessary to recognize their views. This recognition is a show of satisfaction for the task accomplished by the stakeholders. If the solution that you choose involves some form of technical knowhow, it is good to take the stakeholders on training over the implementation of the solution. This will ensure that all are aware of the implementation of the solution. Finally, give the stakeholders various leadership roles to take in the aim of implementing the solution. For example, if there is a visitor seeking information on a particular issue, give one stakeholder an opportunity to explain. Stakeholders are individuals interested in the outcome of policies and the success of an organization. This drives them to influence the outcome of such results and accomplishment of financial obligations. In normal cases, there exist two groups of stakeholders: internal and external stakeholders, who exist within the organizations setting and those outside the organization respectively. For example, a stakeholder can be the owner of the business, employee, manager, customer, partner or even a supplier among others; and contributes to the business of an organization either directly or indirectly (Bernstein Bonafede, 2011). Additionally, either stakeholders, internal or external may involve themselves with the outcome of a project or activity other than business, but they often stand to lose or gain depending on the decisions made or policies implemented in the organization. This paper aims to analyze the influence that the internal and external stakeholders have on the homeland secu rity issues such as lack of communication and organization. In reference to the organization structure of the Homeland organization, jurisdiction and organization correlated and directly faced impact from the actions of both the internal stakeholders like the CIA and DOD and the external stakeholders (partners who have an interest in ensuring that homeland achieves the best in maintaining security in the United States). For instance, the internal stakeholders have considerable access to the administration and the structure of the Homeland organization, hence any decision that the organization makes they aalso have to go through first before implementation. This positively influences the decisions on the organizational structure in that they unbiasedly settle on the best model structure to implement in management and operations of homeland security. As a result, this has led to the advanced restructured arrangements of the departments in homeland security leading to easy communication, transparency and efficiency in homeland operations (Bernst ein Bonafede, 2011). On the other hand, any changes in the jurisdiction of the homeland security organization, directly affects their respective stakeholders who in return have to source out alternative lines of access to the organizations successful operations. Hence, they end up persuading new partners into networking with the homeland security organization, which consequently changes the organization's structure entirely. Stakeholders especially, internal stakeholders normally prefer to have all the programs constituted under one cluster for easy management on the full range, therefore, this consolidation of programs sees that an organization consolidates its structure into one compact model for easy management. Evidently, the internal stakeholders have influenced the same on homeland security organization, hence the existence of the cabinet-level departments at the organization that promote specialization in dealing with security issues. This consolidation of programs has also positively impacted on the security issue on lack of communication; in that the organization now has advanced into a close need structure of communication that updates them with highly crucial details about security anytime, anywhere. On the contrary, the scatter of programs among the different partnering agencies (external stakeholders) has also negatively affected the communication channels that relay immediate feedback to the homeland security base in the United States. The scattered nature of the external stakeholders also negatively affected the communication of the homeland security; in that, the organization lacked proper consolidation of ideas and strategies to plan for any cases of terrorist attacks. Hence, t his subsequently led to their fragmentation following the terrorist attack in November 2001 (Sauter Carafano, 2005). Furthermore, the shared responsibility by the external stakeholders has seen the homeland security organization restructure its department to cover all sectors in ensuring a balance in the food, industry and agriculture security, which emerges as on the stakeholders leading positive effects. The external stakeholders such as the federal agencies involved in communication issues that deal with security, negatively affect the homeland organizations communication network due to their resistance in accepting the link between the local, federal and state partners in sharing critical information regarding matters of state in national security. Additionally, the lack of clarified roles and identification of external stakeholders has negatively influenced the effort of the Homeland security organization in implementing advanced model structures of the organization's management in order to increase their operations effectiveness. Nevertheless, other external partners or stakeholders of the homeland security organization such as FDA, DHS and USDA have facilitated better communication (Sauter Carafano, 2005). They did so through networking in an effort to obtain security clearances for some state personnel during critical, emergency operations in communication and sharing of sensitive security information. Since the rapidness in communication and notification systems used during incident reporting requires the careful merge of both the external and the internal stakeholders in decision-making, this has positively influenced the communication channels opening the organization to the world for easy communication and feedback on security related issues. This collaboration has also led to the strengthened ties between the organization and other scattered external stakeholders improving its operations and in return synchronizing its organizational structure for better management. Considering stakeholders in solving the problem linked to lack of communication and organization will come in handy because an organization without partners may likely fail or perform poorly, and since evidence exists that supports the positive benefits of the stakeholders contributions to the homeland security organization outweighing the negative, they hold an extremely vital position in the solution. The homeland security organization needs to increase and expand its link to external stakeholders because matters of state security need more networking from outside partners rather than the internal stakeholders. Buy custom Internal and External Stakeholders essay

Major General Oliver O. Howard in the Civil War

Major General Oliver O. Howard in the Civil War Oliver O. Howard - Early Life Career: The son of Rowland and Eliza Howard, Oliver Otis Howard was born at Leeds, ME on November 3, 1830. Losing his father at age nine, Howard received a strong education at series of academies in Maine before electing to attend Bowdoin College. Graduating in 1850, he decided to pursue a military career and sought an appointment to the US Military Academy. Entering West Point that year, he proved a superior student and graduated fourth in a class of forty-six in 1854. Among his classmates were J.E.B. Stuart and Dorsey Pender. Commissioned as a second lieutenant, Howard moved through a series of ordnance assignments including time at Watervliet and Kennebec Arsenals. Marrying Elizabeth Waite in 1855, he received orders to take part in a campaign against the Seminoles in Florida two years later. Oliver O. Howard – The Civil War Begins: Though a religious man, while in Florida Howard experienced a deep conversion to evangelical Christianity. Promoted to first lieutenant that July, he returned to West Point as a mathematics instructor that fall. While there, he frequently considered leaving the service to enter the ministry. This decision continued to weigh on him, however as sectional tensions built and the Civil War neared, he resolved to defend the Union. With the attack on Fort Sumter in April 1861, Howard prepared to go to war. The following month, he took command of the 3rd Maine Infantry Regiment with the rank of colonel of volunteers. As the spring progressed, he rose to command the Third Brigade in Colonel Samuel P. Heintzelman’s Third Division in the Army of Northeastern Virginia. Taking part in the First Battle of Bull Run on July 21, Howard’s brigade occupied Chinn Ridge but was driven off in confusion after being attacked by Confederate troops led by Colonels Jubal A. Early and Arnold Elzey . Oliver O. Howard – An Arm Lost: Promoted to brigadier general on September 3, Howard and his men joined Major General George B. McClellan’s newly-formed Army of the Potomac. Recognized for his devout religious beliefs, he soon earned the sobriquet â€Å"the Christian General† though this title was often used with a degree of sarcasm by his comrades. In the spring of 1862, his brigade moved south for the Peninsula Campaign. Serving in Brigadier General John Sedgwick’s division of Brigadier General Edwin Sumner’s II Corps, Howard joined McClellan’s slow advance towards Richmond. On June 1, he returned to combat when his men met the Confederates at the Battle of Seven Pines. As the fighting raged, Howard was hit twice in the right arm. Taken from the field, the injuries proved serious enough that the arm was amputated. Oliver O. Howard - A Rapid Rise: Recovering from his wounds, Howard missed the remainder of the fighting on the Peninsula as well as the defeat at Second Manassas. Returning to his brigade, he led it during the fighting at Antietam on September 17. Serving under Sedgwick, Howard took command of the division after his superior was badly wounded during an attack near the West Woods. In the fighting, the division sustained heavy losses as Sumner had ordered it into action without conducting proper reconnaissance. Promoted to major general in November, Howard retained command of the division. With Major General Ambrose Burnside’s ascent to command, the Army of the Potomac moved south to Fredericksburg. On December 13, Howard’s division took part in the Battle of Fredericksburg. A bloody disaster, the fighting saw the division make a failed assault on the Confederate defenses atop Marye’s Heights. Oliver O. Howard - XI Corps: In April 1863, Howard received an appointment to replace Major General Franz Sigel as commander of XI Corps. Largely comprised of German immigrants, the men of XI Corps immediately began lobbying for Sigel’s return as he too was an immigrant and had been a popular revolutionary in Germany. Imposing a high level of military and moral discipline, Howard quickly earned his new command’s resentment. In early May, Major General Joseph Hooker, who had replaced Burnside, attempted to swing around to the west of Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s position at Fredericksburg. In the resulting Battle of Chancellorsville, Howard’s corps occupied the right flank of the Union line. Though advised that his right flank was in the air by Hooker, he took no action to anchor it on a natural obstacle or construct substantial defenses. On the evening of May 2, Major General Thomas â€Å"Stonewall† Jackson mounted a devastating flank attack which routed XI Corps and des tabilized the Union position. Though shattered, XI Corps mounted a fighting retreat that saw it lose around a quarter of its strength and Howard was conspicuous in his attempts to rally his men. Effectively spent as a fighting force, XI Corps did not play a meaningful role in the rest of the battle. Recovering from Chancellorsville, the corps marched north the following month in pursuit of Lee who intended to invade Pennsylvania. On July 1, XI Corps moved to the aid of Brigadier General John Buford’s Union cavalry and Major General John Reynolds I Corps which had become engaged in the opening phases of the Battle of Gettysburg. Approaching on the Baltimore Pike and Taneytown Road, Howard detached a division to guard the key heights of Cemetery Hill to the south of Gettysburg before deploying the rest of his men on I Corps’ right north of town. Attacked by Lieutenant General Richard S. Ewell’s Second Corps, Howard’s men were overwhelmed and forced to fall back after one of his division commanders, Brigadier General Francis C. Barlow, blundered by moving his men out of position. As the Union line collapsed, XI Corps retreated back through town and assumed a defensive position on Cemetery Hill. As Reynolds had been killed early in the fighting, Howard served as the senior Union leader on the field until Major General Winfield S. Hancock arrived with orders from army commander Major General George G. Meade to take over. Despite Hancock’s written orders, Howard resisted ceding control of the battle. Remaining on the defensive for the remainder of the battle, XI Corps turned back Confederate attacks the next day. Though criticized for his corps’ performance, Howard later received the thanks of Congress for selected the ground on which the battle would be fought. Oliver O. Howard – Going West: On September 23, XI Corps and Major General Henry Slocum’s XII Corps were detached from the Army of the Potomac and set west to aid Major General Ulysses S. Grant’s efforts to relieve Major General William S. Rosecrans’ besieged Army of the Cumberland at Chattanooga. Collectively led by Hooker, the two corps aided Grant in opening a supply line to Rosecrans’ men. In late November, XI Corps took part in the fighting around the city which culminated with General Braxton Bragg’s Army of Tennessee being driven from Missionary Ridge and forced to retreat south. The following spring, Grant departed to take overall command of the Union war effort and leadership in the west passed to Major General William T. Sherman. Organizing his forces for a campaign against Atlanta, Sherman directed Howard to take over IV Corps in Major General George H. Thomas’ Army of the Cumberland. Moving south in May, Howard and his corps saw action at Picketts Mill on the 27th and Kennesaw Mountain a month later. As Shermans armies neared Atlanta, part of IV Corps took part in the Battle of Peachtree Creek on July 20. Two days later, Major General James B. McPherson, commander of the Army of the Tennessee, was killed at the Battle of Atlanta. With the loss of McPherson, Sherman directed Howard to take over the Army of the Tennessee. On July 28, he led his new command into battle at Ezra Church. In the fighting, his men turned back attacks by Lieutenant General John Bell Hood. In late August, Howard led the Army of the Tennessee at the Battle of Jonesboro which resulted in Hood being forced to abandon Atlanta. Reorganizing his forces that fall, Sherman retained Howard in his position and had the Army of the Tennessee serve as the right wing of his March to the Sea. Oliver O. Howard - Final Campaigns: Departing in mid-November, Shermans advance saw Howards men and Slocums Army of Georgia drive through the heart of Georgia, living off the land, and sweeping aside light enemy resistance. Reaching Savannah, Union forces captured the city on December 21. In the spring of 1865, Sherman pushed north into South Carolina with Slocum and Howards commands. After capturing Columbia, SC on February 17, the advance continued and Howard entered North Carolina in early March. On March 19, Slocum was attacked by General Joseph E. Johnston at the Battle of Bentonville. Turning, Howard brought his men to Slocums aid and the combined armies compelled Johnston to retreat. Pressing on, Howard and his men were present the following month when Sherman accepted Johnstons surrender at Bennett Place. Oliver O. Howard - Later Career: An ardent abolitionist before the war, Howard was appointed head of the Freedmens Bureau in May 1865. Charged with integrating freed slaves into society, he implemented a wide array of social programs including education, medical care, and food distribution. Backed by the Radical Republicans in Congress, he often clashed with President Andrew Johnson. During this time, he aided in the formation of Howard University in Washington, DC. In 1874, he assumed command of the Department of the Columbia with his headquarters in the Washington Territory. While out west, Howard took part in the Indian Wars and in 1877 mounted a campaign against the Nez Perce which resulted in the capture of Chief Joseph. Returning east in 1881, he briefly served as superintendent at West Point before taking command of the Department of the Platte in 1882. Belatedly presented with the Medal of Honor in 1893 for his actions at Seven Pines, Howard retired in 1894 after serving as commander of the Department of the East. Moving to Burlington, VT, he died on October 26, 1909 and was buried at Lake View Cemetery. Selected Sources Civil War Trust: Oliver O. HowardNNDB: Oliver O. Howard Civil War: Oliver O. Howard

Cross-cultural communication and classroom ecology Essay - 1

Cross-cultural communication and classroom ecology - Essay Example rÐ µligion, disÐ °bility Ð µtc Ð °s wÐ µll Ð °s bÐ µing mindful of thÐ µ difficultiÐ µs thÐ °t somÐ µ groups cÐ °n fÐ °cÐ µ Ð °nd Ð µnsuring thÐ °t Ð °ny obstÐ °clÐ µs to thÐ µm Ð °rÐ µ rÐ µmovÐ µd. PÐ µrhÐ °ps surprisingly, it doÐ µs not mÐ µÃ °n trÐ µÃ °ting Ð °ll Ð µquÐ °lly. For Ð µxÐ °mplÐ µ, Ð µquÐ °lity of opportunity will not nÐ µcÐ µssÐ °rily bÐ µ Ð µnsurÐ µd if thosÐ µ who spÐ µÃ °k Еnglish Ð °s thÐ µir sÐ µcond or third lÐ °nguÐ °gÐ µ Ð °rÐ µ Ð °ssÐ µssÐ µd Ð µquÐ °lly Ð °gÐ °inst thosÐ µ who spÐ µÃ °k it Ð °s thÐ µir first Ð °nd only lÐ °nguÐ °gÐ µ. ThÐ µ formÐ µr mÐ °y nÐ µÃ µd Ð °dditionÐ °l cÐ °rÐ µ Ð °nd tÐ µÃ °ching if Ð °ssÐ µssmÐ µnt Ð °gÐ °inst othÐ µrs in thÐ µir yÐ µÃ °r is to hold mÐ µÃ °ning. In this rÐ µspÐ µct, simply rÐ µmoving obstÐ °clÐ µs from thÐ µ pÐ °th of Ð °ll studÐ µnts mÐ °y not bÐ µ Ð µnough to providÐ µ Ð °ll with Ð µquÐ °lity of opportunity. PositivÐ µ Ð °ction (somÐ µtimÐ µs rÐ µfÐ µrrÐ µd to Ð °s positivÐ µ discriminÐ °tion) mÐ °y bÐ µ nÐ µcÐ µssÐ °ry. This involvÐ µs crÐ µÃ °ting thÐ µ circumstÐ °ncÐ µs in which Ð µquÐ °lit y of opportunity cÐ °n Ð µxist, rÐ °thÐ µr thÐ °n lÐ µÃ °ving it to chÐ °ncÐ µ. For Ð ° physicÐ °lly— disÐ °blÐ µd studÐ µnt, prÐ °cticÐ °l chÐ °ngÐ µs to thÐ µ school Ð µnvironmÐ µnt Ð °rÐ µ nÐ µÃ µdÐ µd (such Ð °s rÐ °mps instÐ µÃ °d of stÐ µps). Ð  pupil struggling with Ð °ttÐ µntion dÐ µficit disordÐ µr cÐ °n find this disÐ °dvÐ °ntÐ °gÐ µ diminishÐ µd or Ð µliminÐ °tÐ µd if thÐ µy Ð °rÐ µ sÐ µÃ °tÐ µd Ð °s closÐ µ to thÐ µ tÐ µÃ °chÐ µr Ð °s possiblÐ µ Ð °nd surroundÐ µd by positivÐ µ rolÐ µ modÐ µls. For clÐ °ssroom tÐ µÃ °chÐ µrs, thÐ µrÐ µ Ð °rÐ µ Ð ° fÐ µw quÐ µstions thÐ °t cÐ °n bÐ µ focusÐ µd on pÐ µriodicÐ °lly to bring Ð °ttÐ µntion to thÐ µ issuÐ µ of Ð µquÐ °l opportunitiÐ µs. ThÐ µ goÐ °l is not to work slÐ °vishly to thÐ µ nÐ µÃ µd for Ð µquÐ °lity of opportunity but to dÐ µvÐ µlop Ð ° nÐ °turÐ °l instinct for sussing out whÐ µn pupils mÐ °y bÐ µ inÐ °dvÐ µrtÐ µntly disÐ °dvÐ °ntÐ °gÐ µd. This might bÐ µ Ð ° rÐ µsult of thÐ µ work you hÐ °vÐ µ Ð °skÐ µd thÐ µm to do or of thÐ µir intÐ µrÐ °ctions in your clÐ °ssroom. WÐ µ Ð °ll hÐ °vÐ µ prÐ µjudicÐ µs – its pÐ °rt of intÐ µrÐ °cting with humÐ °ns. But bÐ µing Ð °wÐ °rÐ µ of your prÐ µjudicÐ µs

Black & Decker - Eastern Hemisphere and ADP Initiative Case Study - 1

Black & Decker - Eastern Hemisphere and ADP Initiative - Case Study Example His prime concern was the fact that he found significant disparity in the ‘management styles’ that existed in the region. He found that certain managerial styles emphasized on employee empowerment whereas, others belonged to old authoritarian method. From his observation he felt that a few managers were bad managers. The other aspect was related to the growth and development of the people as he felt that in this region quite a few people were stagnant in their position. The other crucial matter of concern was with regards to existing process of management assessment as well as development system. They followed MBO-type system which had been discarded in the US a few years before. Bill Lancaster observed that these concerns required immediate addressing in order to not only increase the organizational growth in the Eastern Hemisphere organization but also to instigate human resource growth and development. Appraisal Development Plan (ADP) was first introduced in the Black & Decker in 1992 as a replacement method of appraisal to the existing MBO (Management by Objective) plan. ADP method of appraisal was observed to be one of the best tools available to provide employees with set goals and career plans similar to MBO process. The added benefit that ADP provided was that it was Eastern Hemisphere organization undeniably superior to MBO in guiding people towards growth prospects. The ADP plan followed six steps appraisal process which was in line with the 3600 appraisal method.